Flexible nature of natural concepts and their combinations
The main argument for applying the formal apparatus of quantum theory to the domain of cognition has to do with the flexibility, instability, and context-dependency of natural concepts that manifest themselves as fleeting contents of conscious experience. For example, in the domain of language, words are floating freely in a polyvalent state representing a variety of different uses. As the properties of small particles are not absolute and determined until observing them, the properties of word tokens are not determined until conscious apprehension. Similarly, impressions, ideas and opinions are conceptual entities with analogous properties and likewise invite an analysis in terms of quantum theory.
As suggested by the pioneers of quantum cognition (e.g. Gabora & Aerts 2002, Khrennikov 1999) the quantum formalism can be used to describe the flexible nature of concepts and their combinations in a very simple way in terms of interference effect. This solves well-known puzzles of adjectival modification - such as what is the colour of a red apple (contrasting with the colour of a red flag or red bean (Blutner 2007). Further, it suggests a new approach to several puzzles of bounded rationality (Franco 2007).
There are paradoxical violations of the sure thing principle (Savage 1954)which have resisted explanation by classical decision theory for over a decade. Pothos & Busemeyer (2009) demonstrate that a quantum probability model using Schrödinger's equation provides an elegant of the puzzle. It is convincingly argued that quantum probability provides an appropriate framework for modelling human decision processes.
- Pothos & Busemeyer (2009)
Quantum field theory of intelligence
Based on earlier works starting in the 80ies of the last century, Weiss & Weiss (2003) propose a quantum field theory of intelligence. In this approach, the mind-brain has to be seen as a unitary cavity resonator by explicitly exploiting Bose-Einstein statistics (building on ideas of Pascual-Leone). One remarkable hypothesis is that the principle of information coding by the mind-brain is based on the golden mean.
- Weiss & Weiss (2003)
Starting in the eighties of the last century Geissler and his collegues formulated a taxonomic model of quantal timing which is based on the entrainment of temporal intervals. The inspection of many different experimental findings suggested that all distinct times are multiples of a small value of about 4.6 ms. A study of apparent motion of Gamma type (Kompass & Geissler 2004) resulted in experimental distributions that show close analogies to the famous Franck/Hertz experiment in physics − demonstrating that electrons occuppy only discrete, quantized energy states.
Kompass & Geissler (2001)
From the first-person-perspective, phenomenal states of consciousness are multiple realized by neural activation states of the brain, thereby inducing particular partitions of the neural state space. Likewise, physiological measurements of neural activity through EEG/ERP, MEG, PET or fMRI from the third-person-perspective provide a coarse-graining of neural activation patterns that also leads to partitions of the neural state space. In general, these induced partitions will be incompatible to each other, supporting Velmans (2002).
Many particle systems in quantum physics are described by Fock space states, which are direct sums of tensor product states of arbitrary rank. Such states can represent cognitive data structures such as lists, trees, or frames. A natural way to realize cognitive Fock space representations by neural networks is provided by function spaces in dynamic field theory (Thelen et al. 2001). Appropriately chosen function systems such as spherical harmonics exhibit recursion properties (through Clebsch-Gordan coefficients) that allow for infinite combinatorial productivity as required for neural realizations of cognitive architectures.
Quantum Cognition suggests a new and principled way to formalize the distinction between semantic ambiguity and semantic nonspecificity in terms of mixture and superposition, respectively, as first proposed by Jay Atlas (2005). Psychologists have described multistable figures such as the ambiguous maiden/hag drawing and the famous Necker cube. As Atlas points out, there is an important difference between these two examples: the former counts as real ambiguity, but the latter as nonspecificity. An ambiguous figure (or sentence) does not spontaneously perform semantic flips but a nonspecific one does. Moreover, only in cases of nonspecificity one finds the free combination of readings such as the 4 readings of Atlas’ double Necker cube.
Empirical verification of Atlas' view has been provided by Philipp Koralus' (2010) PhD: Semantics in Philosophy and Cognitive Neuroscience: the Open Instruction Theory of Attitude Report Sentences, Descriptions, and the Necker Cube.
The Necker cube is a paradigmatic example for bistable perception where pattern reversal obeys a particular probability distribution. Atmanspacher, Filk and Römer (2004) discussed this switching dynamics in terms of the quantum Zeno effect where “observation” (here attending to a percept) increases the dwell-time of an otherwise fast decaying unobserved state.
Opinion forming and personality psychology
Aerts et al. (2008) have applied a quantum analysis to a cognitive setting where individuals’ opinions were probed. Three different questions for the opinion poll were considered:
Q1 : Are you in
favour of the use of nuclear energy?
Q2 : Do you think it would be a good idea to legalize soft-drugs?
Q3 : Do you think capitalism is better than social-democracy?
Interestingly, in such situations, most people don’t have a predetermined opinion. Instead, the opinion is formed to a large extent during the process of questioning in a context-dependent way. Personality tests can be seen as a related cognitive setting where individual opinions are probed (Blutner & Hochnadel 2009).
They concern the geometry of information retrieval (Widdows 2003; Van Rijsbergen 2004), the semantics ofquestions (Blutner 2011), Hilbert space semantics and nonmonotonic logic (Engesser & Gabbay 2002)
- Blutner (20